Skip to main content
· 1/30/2007

Dobbs v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Citations

  • 475 F.3d 1176
  • 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2429
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1977
  • 2007 WL 241282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to district court to apply amended statutory language where “amendment’s legislative history suggest[ed] that Congress expanded [relevant] definition to clarify . . . legal ambiguity”
  • \We do not reach the [preemption issue] because we remand the case so that the District Court can consider [whether federal or state law applies] in light of a recent change in federal law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Mekay, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.