· 1/30/2007
Dobbs v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Citations
- 475 F.3d 1176
- 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2429
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1977
- 2007 WL 241282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to district court to apply amended statutory language where “amendment’s legislative history suggest[ed] that Congress expanded [relevant] definition to clarify . . . legal ambiguity”
- \We do not reach the [preemption issue] because we remand the case so that the District Court can consider [whether federal or state law applies] in light of a recent change in federal law.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Mekay, Henry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.