Dobbin v. Wybrants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an essential element in a dog bite claim is that plaintiffs “must prove that the defendants knew or should have known about the dog’s dangerous propensities.”
• third element that a dog bite claimant must prove is “that the defendants knew or should have known about the dog’s dangerous propensities”
• “[E]vidence of subsequent remedial measures becomes relevant only when the defendant has raised the issue of control and ownership.” (citing E. CLEARY, MCCORMICK’S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF EVIDENCE § 275, at 817 (3d ed. 1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).