Skip to main content
· 4/25/2001

Dobbin v. Artuz

Citations

  • 143 F. Supp. 2d 292
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5170
  • 2001 WL 427350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that inmate’s chronic back injury satisfied the objective prong of the deliberate indifference claim at the summary judgment stage
  • explaining that “the failure to provide prescribed medication in the face of an inmate’s extreme weight loss and deteriorating condition” could violate the Eighth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.