Doan v. Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Arkansas conflict-of-laws rules would require application of” the other state’s laws only where the relevant law “would be characterized as ‘substantive,’ rather than ‘procedural’” (citation omitted)
• distinguishable because plaintiff did 3 not allege that defendant “engaged in a pattern or practice of failing to report its 4 monitoring results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).