Skip to main content
· 10/5/1995

Doan v. Commission on Judicial Performance

Citations

  • 902 P.2d 272
  • 11 Cal. 4th 294
  • 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 254
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7889
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 13481
  • 1995 Cal. LEXIS 5833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Court describes the 12 purpose of § 288 as protecting “underage victims from a broad range of sexually motivated 13 acts.”
  • trial court violated Canon 3, “forsaking his stance of neutrality” in writing letter to attorney general suggesting that attorney general file motion for rehearing of appellate decision reversing trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.