Skip to main content
· 11/16/1984

DO Creasman Elect. v. ST. DEPT. OF LABOR

Citations

  • 458 So. 2d 894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the special deputy's conclusion that the worker was an employee because the employer checked each job for correctness and could make the worker redo the job if it was done incorrectly
  • cable splicers who established their own schedules, controlled the means by which they performed their services, and were highly skilled specialists who routinely worked without supervision held to be independent contractors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.