Skip to main content
· 3/17/2000

DMS Properties-First, Inc. v. P.W. Scott Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 748 A.2d 389
  • 2000 Del. LEXIS 109
  • 2000 WL 300976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing “decisions of other jurisdictions that have enacted a form of the Uniform Arbitration Act”
  • “[T]he arbitrability of the merits of a dispute depends upon whether the parties agreed to arbitrate that dispute”
  • “A party e.g., Century Indem. Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 584 F.3d 513, 528 Gd Cir. 2009
  • “A party cannot be forced to arbitrate the merits of a dispute . . . in the absence of a clear expression of such intent in a valid agreement.”
  • “A party cannot be forced to arbitrate the merits of a dispute . . . in the absence of a clear expression of such intent in a valid agreement.”
  • “A party cannot be forced to arbitrate the merits of a dispute . . . in the absence of a clear expression of such intent in a valid agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Holland, Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.