Skip to main content
· 3/27/1951

D'Luhosch v. Andros

Citations

  • 200 Misc. 400
  • 109 N.Y.S.2d 491
  • 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the snow bank was “of artificial origin” because it was “apparently deposited as the result of the plowing of the street by the city and state snow plows”
  • considering snowbank created by plowing and that blocked access to the sidewalk to be “of artificial origin”
  • stating proof of hills and ridges was not required where plaintiffs produced evidence that snowbank on defendants’ property was of artificial origin, i.e., created as a result of street plowing
  • stating “the ‘hills and ridges’ doctrine may be applied only in cases where the snow and ice complained of are the result of an entirely natural accumulation, following a recent snowfall”
  • stating “the ‘hills and ridges’ doctrine may be applied only in cases where the snow and ice complained of are the result of an entirely natural accumulation, following a recent snowfall”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.