Dlugolinski v. Frances
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 5746
Syllabus
Civ.R. 60(B) Civ.R. 55(A) default judgment relief from judgment counterclaim abuse of discretion neglect excusable neglect notice. A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment based on excusable neglect where the underlying neglect consists of a party: (1) failing to respond to a counterclaim after receiving notice (2) failing to respond to a motion for default judgment after receiving notice and (3) failing to appear at the hearing on the motion for default judgment when docket notes date and time for hearing.
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-06· cited 482×
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 452×
- Vaught v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio Supreme Court· 2003-05-07· cited 53×
- Settonni v. SettonniOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05· cited 9×
- Russo v. FonsecaOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 7×
- Culler v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-11· cited 6×
- Rawlin Graves Co, L.P.A. v. Jatsek Constr. Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.