D.L. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that because the appellant made no separate argument specifically treating and analyzing a claim under the Indiana Constitution distinct from the Fourth Amendment analysis, the claim could be resolved on the basis of federal constitutional doctrine alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• K.W. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2013-02-22· cited 48×
• Copas v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-13· cited 4×
• D.M. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 2×
• DM v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 1×
• DL v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-07
• R.M. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-13

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• New Jersey v. T. L. O.
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
• Ackerman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-12· cited 94×
• Gibson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-07-31· cited 70×
• Myers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 41×
• Ransom v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 39×
• Cochran v. Indiana
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-08· cited 34×
• Cochran v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-17· cited 34×
• S.A. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-08-09· cited 34×
• Berry v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-10-31· cited 32×
• C.S. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-09-08· cited 25×
• D.I.R. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-07-23· cited 16×
• D.B. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-04· cited 8×