Skip to main content
· 10/27/1997

D.L. Braughler Company, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Secretary of the Army

Citations

  • 127 F.3d 1476
  • 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,183
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29370
  • 1997 WL 662672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claim does not arise if no request for final decision from CO
  • “Dan and Betty [Clingerman, the CO], The company cannot accept the adhesion contract(s) contained in and added to the bottom of your emails[.]”
  • letter styled as a claim with a certification and submitted to the resident engineer, who was an authorized representative of the CO, did not meet submission requirement because letter sought to resolve matter directly with resident engineer
  • letter styled as a claim with a certification and submitted to the resident engineer, who was an authorized representative of the CO, did not meet submission requirement because letter sought to resolve matter directly with resident engineer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.