DL Baker & Co., Inc. v. Acosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the determination that a written contract is ambiguous is made as a matter of law by the court”
• court finds that “even assuming the existence of an oral agreement dictating the terms of liquidation of stock, any such agreement is entirely ineffective as the Customer Agreement clearly and unambiguously prohibits oral modification of its terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).