DJM Logistics, Incorporated v. FedEx Ground Package System, I

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Dismissal with prejudice of the fourth complaint was warranted because the amendment of the third complaint failed to comply with the district court’s earlier order.”
• \Pro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel for correct and honorable reasons.\
• Although they do not have “unbridled license” to clearly disregard court orders, “[p]ro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel . . . .”
• “Pro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel for correct and honorable reasons. But being a pro se litigant does not give a party unbridled license to disregard clearly communicated court orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Robert McDaniel v. Salam Syed
  Seventh Circuit· 2024-09-16· cited 36×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pruitt v. Mote
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-10-03· cited 2,834×
• Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 958×
• Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald
  Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 573×
• Juana Gonzalez-Koeneke v. Donald West
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-07-01· cited 293×
• Riley v. Elkhart Community Schools
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-07-22· cited 171×
• Campbell v. Forest Preserve District
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-05-15· cited 141×
• Sidney Peterson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2021-01-26· cited 106×
• Wagner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-10-18· cited 67×
• Michelle Jauquet v. Green Bay Area Catholic Educat
  Seventh Circuit· 2021-05-07· cited 36×
• Downs v. Westphal
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-03-22· cited 18×