Djadi v. Corcoran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim brought under Title II of the ADA against the State was barred under the Eleventh Amendment
• presuming that Congress intended the ADA scheme to be exclusive because it serves as a “comprehensive remedial scheme”
• “The legislative history of the ADA indicates that the discriminatory practices of public entities, and not individuals, are the target of Title II.”
• Title II of the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).