Supreme Court of Florida· 7/7/2011
D.J. v. State
Citations
- 67 So. 3d 1029
- 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 363
- 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that security guard’s testimony “that her job was to monitor students’ behavior” did not amount to competent, substantial evidence to support a finding that the guard was a designee of the school’s principal for purposes of section 810.097(2)
- noting that — as here — the cases relied on by the State involved statutes that “did not state that the offender must have been warned to leave by the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner”
- “The constitutional guarantee of due process requires that all essential elements of an offense must be proved by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2001-01-09· cited 238×
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-10-16· cited 164×
- State v. DyeSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-19· cited 74×
- State v. SiglerSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-11· cited 52×
- State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 47×
- Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-09-20· cited 42×
- Standard Jury Inst. in Cr. Cases No. 2006-2Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-07-12· cited 26×
- D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.