Skip to main content

D.J. v. State

Citations

  • 67 So. 3d 1029
  • 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 363
  • 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that security guard’s testimony “that her job was to monitor students’ behavior” did not amount to competent, substantial evidence to support a finding that the guard was a designee of the school’s principal for purposes of section 810.097(2)
  • noting that — as here — the cases relied on by the State involved statutes that “did not state that the offender must have been warned to leave by the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner”
  • “The constitutional guarantee of due process requires that all essential elements of an offense must be proved by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.