Dizek v. Racette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “absent any proof that the dressing was dirty, or had footprints or wheel marks in it, a jury could not reasonably infer that the substance had been on the floor for any appreciable length of time to permit the defendant’s employees to discover and remedy it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).