Dixon v. Whitfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a school board had no nondelegable duty because “[s]chool boards owe their pupils a duty of reasonable care in providing them with safe transportation, but they are not insurers of students’ safety”
• rejecting appellants’ nondelegable duty argument and noting the parties cited no controlling authority, and the court could find none, to support “the proposition that the safe transportation of public school students is a nondelegable duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).