Skip to main content
· 12/9/2010

Dixon v. the Hallmark Companies, Inc.

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 849
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25190
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,052
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1675
  • 2010 WL 4983663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • maintaining an apartment building may serve as consideration for the right to occupy an apartment
  • noting Eleventh Circuit has held documents stating “ ‘Fire Early – he is too old’” and “ ‘ Fire Rollins – she is too old’” constitute direct evidence of discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Anderson, Coar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.