Dixon v. State Bd. of Optometric Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• If the concept of licensing practitioners dealing with public health is to have any vitality and purpose, it is unreasonable to require proof of injury to a patient before approving revocation of a license
• optometrist not denied due process when he chose not to testify at hearing
• optometrist not denied due process when he chose not to testify at hearing
• notice of agency review of an initial decision is not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).