Dixon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fingerprints found on TV sets which had been on public display in store admissible to corroborate identity of defendant as perpetrator otherwise established by evidence that TV sets were found in his car
• defendant's argument that there was an insufficient showing of a chain of custody of his clothes was without merit.
• where a print is left in a place open to the public and there is no other evidence of identity, the courts must assume that a defendant was shopping rather than stealing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zeigler v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-11· cited 111×
• Sorey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-28· cited 47×
• Knight v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-05-17· cited 11×
• Miles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-11· cited 8×
• Dixon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1969-03-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tirko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-03-01· cited 34×
• Ivey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-06-30· cited 28×