Dixon v. Shamrock Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting “well-pleaded facts as true, but reject[ing] ‘unsupported conclusions or interpretations of law’” in reviewing Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal
• accepting “well-pleaded facts as true, but reject[ing] ‘unsupported conclusions or interpretations of law’” in reviewing Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal
• accepting “well-pleaded facts as true, but reject[ing] ‘unsupported conclusions or interpretations of law’” in reviewing Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal
• accepting “well-pleaded facts as true, but reject[ing] ‘unsupported conclusions or interpretations of law’” in reviewing Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal
• “Congress’s choice to omit from the FCRA any requirement for the inclusion of loan terms is properly interpreted to mean that Congress did not intend to require any such terms.”
• “We accept [plaintiff’s] well-pleaded facts as true, but reject ‘unsupported conclusions or interpretations of law.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).