· 11/6/1992
Dixon v. Pugh
Citations
- 423 S.E.2d 169
- 244 Va. 539
- 9 Va. Law Rep. 536
- 1992 Va. LEXIS 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting Virginia’s traditional rule “that a court may not modify an award of spousal support in a divorce decree in the absence of a statute or a clear and explicit reservation of jurisdiction to modify the spousal support provision”
- noting Virginia's traditional rule \that a court may not modify an award of spousal support in a divorce decree in the absence of a statute or a clear and explicit reservation of jurisdiction to modify the spousal support provision\
- nunc pro tunc order cannot be used to create jurisdictional fiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrico, Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, Lacy, Hassell, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.