Skip to main content
· 11/6/1992

Dixon v. Pugh

Citations

  • 423 S.E.2d 169
  • 244 Va. 539
  • 9 Va. Law Rep. 536
  • 1992 Va. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Virginia’s traditional rule “that a court may not modify an award of spousal support in a divorce decree in the absence of a statute or a clear and explicit reservation of jurisdiction to modify the spousal support provision”
  • noting Virginia's traditional rule \that a court may not modify an award of spousal support in a divorce decree in the absence of a statute or a clear and explicit reservation of jurisdiction to modify the spousal support provision\
  • nunc pro tunc order cannot be used to create jurisdictional fiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, Lacy, Hassell, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.