Skip to main content
· 6/29/2010

Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.

Citations

  • 719 F. Supp. 2d 53
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64286
  • 2010 WL 2594958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the plaintiff’s untimely opposition because of the judicial preference for adjudicating a case on its merits rather than dismissing it “based on technicalities”
  • granting motion to dismiss conversion claim because plaintiff’s “leasehold interest in her home is the subject matter of real property,” and the D.C. law of conversion does not apply to real property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.