Dixon v. Kirkpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying public-concern test to determine whether a government employee’s speech is “constitutionally protected”
• applying public-concern test to determine whether a government employee's speech is \constitutionally protected\
• considering \whether the protected speech was a motivating factor in the adverse employment action\
• considering “whether the protected speech was a motivating factor in the adverse employment action”
• referring to the test as the \ Garcetti / Pickering analysis\
• first citing Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006); then citing Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).