Dixon v. Holden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the state legal defense fund “is insurance, or not strictly indemnity”
• highway patrol officers violated right of plaintiff to be free from illegal wiretap
• highway patrol officers violated right of plaintiff to be free from illegal wiretap
• police officer’s action against the State Treasurer and the Commissioner of Ad ministration to satisfy from the State Legal Expense Fund a federal judgment against them, rather than the state, did not violate the doctrine of sovereign immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).