Dixon v. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]llegations of having been cut off from . . . personal property . . . are not violations of the Eighth Amendment.”
• no Eighth Amendment violation where plaintiff had been cut off from prison population, religious services, legal research, medical showers, and personal property and had limits on food access in SHU

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).