Skip to main content
· 3/15/1918

Dixon-Paul Printing Co. v. Board of Public Contracts

Citations

  • 117 Miss. 83
  • 77 So. 908

Syllabus

<p>1. Constitutional Law. Due process of law. Qualifications of bidders for public contracts.</p> <p>Section 1, chapter 135, Laws-1916, prohibiting the board of public contracts from accepting bids for public printing by persons not bona-fide residents of and actually engaged in the printing business within the state, does not violate any of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Section 1, chapter 135, Laws 1916, defining “responsible bidder” as excluding non-residents without a printing plant in the State, is not violative of section 107, Constitution 1890, providing that contracts for printing be let to the lowest “responsible bidder” and giving the legislature power to regulate the letting of contracts. The bidder thus excluded having no vested right in such contracts and the regulation prescribed by the statute being entirely reasonable.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘[e]vidence of estoppel is admissible without being pleaded in order to rebut evidence introduced by the opposite party’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.