Dixon County v. Field
Citations
- 111 U.S. 83
- 4 S. Ct. 315
- 28 L. Ed. 360
- 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1760
Syllabus
<p>Estoppel — Legislative Authority — Municipal Corporations — Nebraska.</p> <p>There must be authority of law, by statute, for every issue of bonds of a municipal corporation as a gift to a railroad or other work of internal improvement.</p> <p>When the Constitution or a statute of a State requires as essential to the validity of municipal bonds that they shall bé registered in a State registry and receive by indorsement a certificate of one or more State officers showing that they are issued in pursuance of law, and the Constitution or law gives no conclusive effect to such registration or to such certificate» the municipality is not concluded by the'certificate from denying the facts certified to.</p> <p>A recital in a municipal bond of facts which the corporate officers had authority - by law to determine and to certify estops the corporation from denying those facts ; but a recital there of facts which the corporate officers had no authority to determine, or a recital of matters of law does not estop the corporation.</p> <p>Section 2, Article XII. of the Constitution of Nebraska, which took effect November 1st, 1875, conferred no power upon a county to add to its authorized or existing indebtedness, without express legislative authority ; but it limited the power of the legislature in that respect by fixing the terms and conditions on which alone it was at liberty to authorize the creation of municipal indebtedness.</p> <p>This was a suit to recover the amount of overdue interest coupons on bonds issued by the plaintiff ip error in aid of a railroad. The defence was that the bonds were issued in violation of provisions of the Constitution of Nebraska which are set forth in the opinion of the court, and without legislative authority. The holder of the bonds contended that the municipality was estopped from setting up this defence by reason of certain recitals in the bonds, and of certain certificates of State officers on. the back of them, which are also referre
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a recital in bonds under which they would conform to the law, when in fact they do not, “will not make them so”
- stating that a recital in bonds under which they would conform to the law, when in fact they do not, “will not make them so”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.