Supreme Court· 1/31/1944
Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 320 U.S. 516
- 64 S. Ct. 364
- 88 L. Ed. 270
- 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an expense is not deductible where the outcome of a liability is contingent upon the outcome of a contested lawsuit because the fáct and amount of the expense cannot be ascertained
- holding that an expense is not deductible where the outcome of a liability is contingent upon the outcome of a contested lawsuit because the fact and amount of the expense cannot be ascertained
- “a taxpayer who accounts on the accrual basis may, and should, deduct ... a liability which really accrues in the taxable year.”
- all events have not occurred where liability is contingent and in contested by taxpayer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
201 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1944-02-28· cited 525×
- United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NYSupreme Court· 1961-05-22· cited 169×
- Lewyt Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1955-05-23· cited 158×
- United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 124×
- Spiegel v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1949-03-31· cited 106×
- Putoma Corp., Successor by Merger of Pro-Mac Company, Petitioners- Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1979-08-27· cited 95×
- United States v. George v. H. KleifgenNinth Circuit· 1977-07-20· cited 89×
- F. W. Drybrough v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, L. N. Simpson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSixth Circuit· 1956-12-03· cited 73×
- Harrold v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Cromling v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFourth Circuit· 1951-12-07· cited 72×
- Central Tablet Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 68×
- Central Cuba Sugar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central Cuba Sugar CoSecond Circuit· 1952-11-10· cited 66×
- Reading & Bates Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-03-20· cited 66×
- Mayfair Minerals, Inc. v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1971-04-15· cited 59×
- Estate of Goodall v. CommissionerEighth Circuit· 1968-03-05· cited 58×
- Guardian Investment Corporation v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1958-04-14· cited 57×
- Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1954-07-14· cited 56×
- The Crosley Corporation v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1956-01-25· cited 55×
- Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1969-06-12· cited 51×
- Mooney Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1970-01-12· cited 48×
- Baltimore Transfer Co. v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1947-01-03· cited 46×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1926-01-11· cited 1,137×
- Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 806×
- Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court· 1934-01-15· cited 546×
- Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 237×
- Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1930-04-14· cited 163×
- American National Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-04-11· cited 147×
- Aluminum Castings Co. v. RoutzahnSupreme Court· 1930-11-24· cited 101×
- JA Dougherty's Sons v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Third Circuit· 1941-06-25· cited 18×
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Central United Nat. BankSixth Circuit· 1938-11-09· cited 12×
- Davies' Estate v. CommissionerSixth Circuit· 1942-03-05· cited 11×
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerFifth Circuit· 1943-03-05· cited 6×
Other cases named Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.