Dixie Furniture Co. v. Ragland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that after the notice of appeal was filed, the juvenile court “conducted various, standard proceedings in this ongoing deprivation and custody case”
• “Consistent with its requirement that appellate courts address only those rulings that ‘may affect the proceedings below,’ OCGA § 5-6-34 (d
• challenge to dependency order rendered moot by subsequent judgments in the juvenile court finding the child dependent
• challenge to dependency order rendered moot by subsequent judgments in the juvenile court finding the child dependent
• juvenile court’s deprivation finding was moot because the mother would still be bound by subsequent orders that declared the child to be deprived
• “[E]ach [subsequent] deprivation order must be supported by clear and convincing evidence that the child at issue is currently deprived, i.e., at the time of the hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).