Dixie Aluminum Products Co. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in finding no prejudice that the party opposing arbitration could use the discovery conducted in the arbitration
• discussing the UCC Comment to section 2-207, which explains that a clause “materially alters” the contract if results in unfair surprise
• “[T]he arbitration provision . . . does not constitute a ‘material alteration.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).