Divita v. Hopple Plastics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “What seems to be emerging, in place of a conceptual approach relying on purely contractual tests, is a common-sense rule made up of a melange of contract, causation, and estoppel ingredients.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).