Skip to main content
· 12/8/1989

Division of Special Revenue, State of Connecticut v. Furman (In re Furman)

Citations

  • 108 B.R. 901
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compliance with ORAP 5.45 is “crucial” to prop- erly put issues before the appellate court, to such a degree that “failure to comply with ORAP 5.45 generally renders the claim of error unreviewable on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krechevsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.