Division of Child Support Enforcement Ex Rel. Blake v. Myrks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, if the court were to allow relitigation of paternity issues under the Delaware Parentage Act, “all findings of paternity made in conjunction with child support proceedings would be nonbinding and subject to attack at a later time”
• noting that, if the court were to allow relitigation of paternity issues under the Delaware Parentage Act, \all findings of paternity made in conjunction with child support proceedings would be nonbinding and subject to attack at a later time\
• applying res judicata to a request for blood testing to determine paternity following an earlier child support order
• individual who stipulated to paternity in an earlier support proceeding barred from subsequently attempting to disestablish paternity under Delaware Parentage Act procedures
• individual who stipulated to paternity in an earlier support proceeding barred from subsequently attempting to disestablish paternity under Delaware Parentage Act procedures
• prior admission of paternity in a child support proceeding is res judicata, and the putative father was not denied due process by the fact that he could not avail himself of blood testing under the Delaware Uniform Parentage Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).