· 12/13/1976
Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy
Citations
- 429 U.S. 1029
- 97 S. Ct. 653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal under D.C.Code § 11-721 where a trial court has declared a contempt adjudication- to be moot
- holding a child who was not a party to a divorce proceeding was not bound by a decision as to his legitimacy or illegitimacy
- “Having failed to state a cause of action under § 1985, plaintiff has failed to state a claim under § 1986”
- refusal to take blood test for fourteen months, which included two months after court order to do so
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.