Skip to main content
· 12/13/1976

Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy

Citations

  • 429 U.S. 1029
  • 97 S. Ct. 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal under D.C.Code § 11-721 where a trial court has declared a contempt adjudication- to be moot
  • holding a child who was not a party to a divorce proceeding was not bound by a decision as to his legitimacy or illegitimacy
  • “Having failed to state a cause of action under § 1985, plaintiff has failed to state a claim under § 1986”
  • refusal to take blood test for fourteen months, which included two months after court order to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.