Divis v. Clarklift of Nebraska, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for period of repose to begin anew after product is refurbished by manufacturer, refurbishment must have extended product’s useful life, and refurbishment must have been defective and proximately caused plaintiff’s injury or damage
• finding that the original manufacturer of a forklift was not liable and the statute of repose did not begin anew because the original manufacturer did not conduct the refurbishment
• describing product at issue as “forklift”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).