Diversified Marketing, Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the likelihood that plaintiffs use of defendant’s name will whittle down the distinctive identity of defendant’s name to be a fact issue to be determined at trial
• “Despite ... attempts at categorization, unfair competition is an ‘adaptable and capacious’ tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).