Skip to main content
· 8/15/2005

Diversified Carting, Inc. v. City of New York

Citations

  • 423 F. Supp. 2d 85
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16778
  • 2005 WL 1950135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that generally actions brought under Stafford Act are against FEMA and holding that the plaintiff did not have an express or implied right of recovery against non-federal governmental entities pursuant to Stafford Act
  • “The provisions of the Miller Act are only applicable where the work in question was contracted for by the United States, or one of its agents or agencies.”
  • deeming plaintiffs complaint amended to substitute new defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.