Diva's, Inc. v. Bangor, City of

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that City Council was shielded by absolute immunity from damages for their denial of appellant’s permit
• concluding members of city council were performing quasi- Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-CT-1972 | September 14, 2020 Page 34 of 59 judicial functions in denying special amusement permit
• applying Rooker-Feldman doctrine to § 1983 action, but concluding that doctrine did not deprive the federal district court of subject-matter jurisdiction in that particular case
• in the context of a motion to dismiss, a court may consider extrinsic documents when their authenticity is undisputed and the complaint is dependent upon the document
• courts deciding motions to dismiss may only consider documents expressly incorporated within the complaint or documents to which a complaint’s factual allegations are expressly linked and admittedly dependent upon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).