Skip to main content
· 12/30/1992

Ditton v. Bowerman

Citations

  • 844 P.2d 919
  • 117 Or. App. 483
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the defendants “were not principal and agent, indemnitee and indemnitor, or successors in interest to property, and this [was] not a derivative action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Deits, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.