· 12/30/1992
Ditton v. Bowerman
Citations
- 844 P.2d 919
- 117 Or. App. 483
- 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the defendants “were not principal and agent, indemnitee and indemnitor, or successors in interest to property, and this [was] not a derivative action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Deits, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.