Skip to main content
· 6/5/2009

Ditta v. Conte

Citations

  • 298 S.W.3d 187
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 823
  • 2009 Tex. LEXIS 319
  • 2009 WL 1566989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trustee removal action not subject to any statute of limitations, and analogizing to other “status” cases such as divorce actions and real property cloud on title cases
  • noting that fiduciary \occupies a position of peculiar confidence towards another\
  • construing petitioner’s brief liberally to contain argument that it did not expressly contain because it contained similar and related arguments
  • observing trust is not legal entity but rather fiduciary relationship with respect to property imposing high fiduciary standards on trustee who must handle trust property solely for beneficiaries’ benefit
  • “Any prior breaches or conflicts on the part of the trustee indicate that the trustee could repeat her behavior and harm the trust in the future.”
  • for appellate court to consider defense of statute of limitations, it must be raised as affirmative defense in pleadings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.