Ditsworth v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an RFA requesting a “party’s understanding of the meaning or intent of a document” is a statement of fact, as opposed to a pure legal conclusion
• “[W]here the question of the meaning of the document is at issue in the case, a request directed to another party seeking an admission or denial of a document’s meaning or intent by that party as stated in the request relates to a statement [of] fact, and is authorized by Rule 36.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).