Ditman v. B. F. Raule & Co.

Citations

• 124 Pa. 225
• 16 A. 819
• 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1025

Syllabus

<p>1. Although a sale of goods unaccompanied by a delivery of possession is in law fraudulent and void as to creditors existing when it is made, yet as to subsequent creditors it is fraudulent only as to those in fact intended to be defrauded.</p> <p>2. Where the validity of a sale of goods is attacked by a creditor whose debt is subsequently incurred, and there is no question raised as to the good faith of the sale as between the parties thereto, it is error to charge that the sale is fraudulent in law and therefore void.</p>