Distronics Corp. v. Roberts-Hamilton Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Minnesota law and holding that a plaintiff’s material breach of contract justifies a defendant’s non-performance
• “Given that Plaintiff does not provide any facts or allegations that his termination was caused by hostility toward his protected status, Defendant's motion to dismiss his wrongful termination claims is granted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).