District & Sec. Trust Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “whether [the prosecuting attorney] is doing a satisfactory job of managing his office is a quintessential political issue which is properly brought before the voters at a regular election”
• noting that \whether [the prosecuting attorney] is doing a satisfactory job of managing his office is a quintessential political issue which is properly brought before the voters at a regular election\
• noting that \whether [the prosecuting attorney] is doing a satisfactory job of managing his office is a quintessential political issue which is properly brought before the voters at a regular election\
• considering weight to be assigned to the state auditor’s opinion that he had “found nothing which in his opinion amounted to ‘misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance on the part of any official’ ”
• “[Respondents present no facts within their knowledge showing Sandhaus intended to violate the law . . . .”
• \[Wjilfullness can probably be found in evidence showing that Sandhaus knew he was overspending and did so even after the Board and the auditor warned him against doing so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).