· 7/23/1985
District-Realty Title Insurance Corporation v. Rudolf Ensmann, James S. Sollins
Citations
- 767 F.2d 1018
- 247 U.S. App. D.C. 228
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The essential inquiry is whether or not the contract allocated the risk of [the non-occurrence of the condition].”
- “[W]hen a contract ‘authorizes’ a party to prevent a condition from occurring, ‘there is no prevention.’ ... The essential inquiry is whether or not the contract allocated the risk of” nonoccurrence of the condition. [emphasis added]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamm, Mikva, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.