Skip to main content
· 7/23/1985

District-Realty Title Insurance Corporation v. Rudolf Ensmann, James S. Sollins

Citations

  • 767 F.2d 1018
  • 247 U.S. App. D.C. 228
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The essential inquiry is whether or not the contract allocated the risk of [the non-occurrence of the condition].”
  • “[W]hen a contract ‘authorizes’ a party to prevent a condition from occurring, ‘there is no prevention.’ ... The essential inquiry is whether or not the contract allocated the risk of” nonoccurrence of the condition. [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Mikva, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.