Skip to main content
· 12/4/1944

District of Columbia v. Vignau

Citations

  • 323 U.S. 781
  • 65 S. Ct. 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when a stipulation was made to save time because a party was confident of success on another point, the stipulation is not binding at a future trial
  • stating that when a stipulation was made to save time because a party was confident of success on another point, the stipulation is not binding at a future trial
  • stipulations entered into for the purpose of abbreviating trial were not intended to admit the issues as a matter of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.