Skip to main content
· 12/22/1970

District of Columbia v. Smith

Citations

  • 271 A.2d 786
  • 1970 D.C. App. LEXIS 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a letter from an insurance company as the sole form of notice to the District did not meet the requirements of Section 12-309
  • finding that a letter from an insurance company as the sole form of notice to the District did not meet the requirements of Section 12-309

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Fick-Ling, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.