District of Columbia v. Robinson
Citations
- 180 U.S. 92
- 21 S. Ct. 283
- 45 L. Ed. 440
- 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1287
Syllabus
<p>The testator of the defendants in error commenced in his lifetime an action against the District of Columbia for trespasses on land of his in the District. The alleged trespasses consisted in entering on the land and dig- . ging up and removing, under claim of right, a quantity of gravel to be used for .repairing and constructing public highways. The testator died before the action was brought to trial. His executors brought it to trial and secured a verdict and judgment in their behalf ¡.which was sustained by the Court of Appeals of the District. The issues involved are stated fully by the court in its opinion here, on which statement it is held:</p> <p>(1) That as there .was no evidence of a formal grant, and as the District relied upon an alleged dedication of the trust to the uses to which the District put it, the issue was properly submitted to the jury:</p> <p>(2) That the Court did not err in holding and instructing the jury that the use of the tract by the.public must have been adverse.to the owner of the fee;</p> <p>(3) That there was no error in holding and instructing the jury that the prescriptive-right of highway was confined to the widtii as actually and without any intermission used for the period of twenty years;</p> <p>(4) That there was no error in so instructing the jury as to deprive the District of a legal presumption that the public acts required to be performed by it in order to give the right claimed bad been performed ;</p> <p>(5) That there was no error in leaving to the jury the question whether the District of Columbia had done the acts constituting the trespass, without-the execution of its lawful powers according to law;</p> <p>(6) That there was no error in submitting to the jury the question whether the gravel was obtained incident to the lawful exercise of the power to grade;</p> <p>(7) That there was no error in sustaining the twelfth prayer of the defendants in error, and thereby submitting to the jury to find and determine bot
Judges: Gray, McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.