Skip to main content
· 12/1/2011

District of Columbia v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

Citations

  • 826 F. Supp. 2d 227
  • 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20360
  • 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 47
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138317
  • 2011 WL 6000851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • intervention is favored when 9 “disposition of the action would result in a substantial change in the status quo with respect to [the movants’] interests”
  • \The Court therefore finds that Section 6972(b)(2)(E) may best be read as clarifying the circumstances in which Rule 24(a) intervention of right is appropriate in a RCRA action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.